Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05093
Original file (BC 2012 05093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05093
		COUNSEL:  NONE
	XXXXXXXXXX	HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be awarded Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) status. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She is an NCO not a senior airman (SrA, E-4).  She took classes 
and has the time in service.  Her discharge papers should 
reflect the correct rank

The applicant provides no documents in support of her request.

Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states that on 27 Jul 1984, 
the applicant was involuntarily discharged with an honorable 
character of service after completing her initial four year 
enlistment.  She was promoted to the grade of SrA on 1 Sep 1983. 
In accordance with AFR 35-16, Appointment to Noncommissioned 
Officer Status, she did not meet the eligibility criteria for 
NCO status when she separated.

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

?
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 21 Jan 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 6 Aug 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

     , Panel Chair
     , Member
     , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-05093:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 2012.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Military Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 8 Jan 2013.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jan 2013.




                                    
                                   Panel Chair

2


2





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657

    Original file (BC-2013-00657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes “Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR,” to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02760

    Original file (BC 2013 02760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFD recommends denial, indicating the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00907

    Original file (BC-2013-00907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Nov 97, the applicant was furnished a honorable discharge with a narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required Active Service,” along with a separation program designator (SPD) code of KBK (Completion of Active Service) and RE code of 4J. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04590

    Original file (BC-2012-04590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04590 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service or involuntary honorable discharge) be changed so that she can be eligible to rejoin the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00756

    Original file (BC 2013 00756.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The board should still consider whether the Control Roster which was issued not only for the contested FA failure, but also for two additional FA failures should be removed. HQ AFPC/DPSIDE administratively corrected the applicant’s EPR (by voiding the report) for the period 12 Aug 08 through 11 Apr 10, and replacing it with an AF Form 77 stating “not rated for the time period, report was removed by order of Chief of Staff of the Air Force.” Additionally, this action resulted in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04621

    Original file (BC-2012-04621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The applicant's supervisor non-recommended her on an AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration on 22 Feb 2011 listing numerous disciplinary infractions and her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01216

    Original file (BC-2013-01216.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The specific reason for this action was on 13 Sep 2004, the applicant was disenrolled from the Intelligence Operations Apprentice training course for academic reason. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of her discharge warranting a change to her character of service, separation code or narrative reason for separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02166

    Original file (BC-2007-02166.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 26 Jul 06, HQ Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) announced implementation of the FY07 NCORP and identified over 3000 NCOs, by order of vulnerability susceptible to retraining. All NCOs identified as vulnerable were given until 15 Jan 07 to submit their initial request, followed by a suspense of 28 Feb 07 to submit a completed application. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: The applicant states she is deployed in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02040

    Original file (BC 2013 02040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02040 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry Code 3A, which denotes “Failure to Complete Course of Instruction,” be changed to 1A, which denotes “Ineligible to Reenlist, but Condition Waived,” to allow reenlistment in the Armed Forces. On 22 Mar 2013, the applicant was notified by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165

    Original file (BC-2012-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...